Effects of Er:YAG laser treatments on surface roughness of base metal alloys


Ergün Kunt G., Guler A. U., Ceylan G., Duran I., ÖZKAN P., KIRTILOĞLU T.

LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, vol.27, no.1, pp.47-51, 2012 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 27 Issue: 1
  • Publication Date: 2012
  • Doi Number: 10.1007/s10103-010-0844-3
  • Journal Name: LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Page Numbers: pp.47-51
  • Keywords: Base metal alloy, Er:YAG laser, Surface roughness, Sandblasting, ER-YAG LASER, FELDSPATHIC CERAMIC SURFACE, BOND STRENGTH, CAVITY PREPARATION, PARTIAL DENTURES, COMPOSITE RESIN, LUTING CEMENTS, DENTIN, ACID, TITANIUM
  • Ondokuz Mayıs University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

We investigated the effects of different Er:YAG laser treatments on the surface roughness of base metal alloys. A total of 36 specimens were prepared of two base metal alloys (Wiron 99, Bellabond plus). The surfaces of the specimens were standardized by gradual wet grinding with 320-, 600-, 800- and 1,000-grit silicon carbide paper for 10 s each on a grinding machine at 300 rpm. Specimens of each alloy were randomly divided into six groups (n = 6) comprising a control group (group C), a group sandblasted with Al2O3 powder at 60 psi for 10 s through a nozzle at a distance of 10 mm (group S), and four Er:YAG laser (Fotona AT) treatment groups. The laser treatment groups were as follows: 500 mJ, 10 Hz, 100 mu s (group 500MSP); 500 mJ, 10 Hz, 300 mu s (group 500SP); 400 mJ, 10 Hz, 100 mu s (group 400MSP); and 400 mJ, 10 Hz, 300 mu s (group 400SP). Surface roughness measurements (Ra) were performed using a profilometer. The data were analysed by two-way ANOVA, and mean values were compared using Tukey's HSD test (alpha = 0.05). According to the two-way ANOVA results, the base metal alloys and interaction between base metal alloy and surface treatment were not statistically significant different (p > 0.05), the surface treatments were significantly different (p < 0.0001). For the two base metal alloy groups, no significant differences were observed among the control, 400MSP, and 400SP groups (p = 0.912), and these groups demonstrated the lowest Ra values. The highest Ra value was observed in group S (p < 0.05). Er:YAG laser treatment at 400 and 500 mJ/10 Hz is not an alternative method for surface roughening of base metal alloys.