Synergetic effect of hybrid surface treatment on the mechanical properties of adhesively bonded AA2024-T3 joints


Ozakin B., Gultekin K.

JOURNAL OF ADHESION, cilt.101, sa.8, ss.1033-1060, 2025 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 101 Sayı: 8
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1080/00218464.2024.2412714
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF ADHESION
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, Aerospace Database, Chemical Abstracts Core, Chimica, Communication Abstracts, Compendex, INSPEC, Metadex, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1033-1060
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: contact angle, Hybrid surface treatment, roughness, surface analysis, tensile test
  • Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Improving the surface properties of AA2024-T3 aluminium alloys is crucial for achieving durable and sustainable joints. For this purpose, AA2024-T3 alloys were first sandblasted at 4, 5 and 6 bar pressures using aluminium oxide and glass sphere abrasives. Then, the sandblasted samples were subjected to the chemical surface treatment resulting in a hybrid surface process. The surface properties of sandblasted and hybrid surface-treated AA2024-T3 alloys were characterised by 3D image analysis, contact angle and roughness measurement. Additionally, single-lap joints were fabricated using adhesives with low and high viscosity. The effect of changes in the viscosity of adhesives and the surface properties of the AA2024-T3 on the mechanical properties of the joints has been analysed in detail. It was found that both sandblasting and hybrid surface treatments applied to AA2024-T3 alloys caused significant improvement in the mechanical properties of the joints. AA2024-T3 alloys, which were chemically surface treated after being sandblasted with glass spheres at 6 bar pressure, were joined using low and high viscosity adhesives, and the failure load of these joints increased by approximately 110% and 68%, respectively, compared to untreated samples. In the case of aluminium oxide usage, the increase rates were determined to be 93% and 43%.