Development of a multiple response-based mixed-integer nonlinear optimization model with both controllable and uncontrollable design factors


ÖZDEMİR A.

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, vol.164, 2022 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 164
  • Publication Date: 2022
  • Doi Number: 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107901
  • Journal Name: COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, ABI/INFORM, Aerospace Database, Applied Science & Technology Source, Business Source Elite, Business Source Premier, Communication Abstracts, Computer & Applied Sciences, INSPEC, Metadex, DIALNET, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Keywords: Quality, Multiple response, A-optimal design, Uncontrollable design factors, Optimization, ROBUST PARAMETER DESIGN, PROGRAMMING APPROACH, NOISE FACTORS, PRINCIPLES
  • Ondokuz Mayıs University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Response surface methodology (RSM) is an appropriate tool for modeling and analyzing existing or new products. In the literature, considerable attention has been paid to develop RSM models while using controllable design factors. However, there are some situations where uncontrollable design factors are required to conduct an experiment. Therefore, this paper is four-fold. One, an A-optimal design is selected as the appropriate design to generate the design matrix. Two, an exchange algorithm is proposed to construct A-optimal design points while dealing with uncontrollable design factors. In addition, fitted mean and standard deviation response functions are obtained with both controllable and uncontrollable design factors. Three, a multiple response-based mixed-integer nonlinear model and its solution procedure are proposed to find optimum operating conditions of both controllable and uncontrollable design factors. Next, a case study is presented to show the effectiveness of the proposed methodology. It is also reported from the case study that the proposed optimization model may achieve a variance reduction of up to 73% compared to the traditional counterpart. Finally, comparison and validation studies are conducted to verify the optimum operating conditions.