E‐Poster | Research Presentation


Creative Commons License

Yıldırım Bolat S., Lütfioğlu M.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, cilt.52, sa.S28, ss.309, 2025 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Özet
  • Cilt numarası: 52 Sayı: S28
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1111/jcpe.14160
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, CAB Abstracts, CINAHL, Veterinary Science Database
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.309
  • Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
  • Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background & Aim: Gingival phenotype (GP) plays a crucial role in periodontal and implant health, influencing outcomes in surgical and non-surgical procedures. GP is commonly assessed by measuring gingival thickness (GT) and keratinized tissue width, with GP classified as either thick or thin. Recent studies highlight the importance of additional factors, such as dental arch location (maxillary/mandibular) and gender, in determining GP. This study aims to evaluate the influence of dental arch and gender on GP using three classification methods: average GT, mean GT, and single-point GT measurements. Methods: GT was measured at three points on each tooth in the anterior region. Participants were selected based on specific inclusion criteria and provided informed consent. GT measurements were averaged across points, and GP was categorized as thick or thin based on threshold values. The study assessed differences in GP according to dental arch and gender, using statistical analyses to identify significant variations across these groups. Results: The findings revealed significant differences in GT based on dental arch and gender. The maxillary arch exhibited greater GT values compared to the mandibular arch, and males generally had thicker gingiva than females. All three GP classification methods—average GT, mean GT, and single-point GT—showed consistent results, with mean GT emerging as a particularly reliable indicator of GP. These variations underscore the influence of dental arch and gender on gingival thickness, supporting the need for individualized clinical assessments. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that both gender and dental arch location significantly impact gingival phenotype, with potential implications for clinical decision-making in periodontal and implant treatments. Understanding these influences allows for more tailored approaches to patient care, enhancing treatment outcomes in gingival tissue management