The 5th International Conference S.Arch 2018, Venice, İtalya, 22 - 24 Mayıs 2018, ss.835-845, (Tam Metin Bildiri)
Turkey is a
country suffering from disasters, especially earthquakes, because of its
location. Disasters cause physical damage as much as economically. One of the
most important physical injuries is that the houses become destroyed and cannot
be seated. For this reason, the need for housing is very important after a
disaster. To cope with this problem, permanent houses, post disaster housing in
other words, are built in many areas to provide accommodation for households
whose houses cannot be seated. Post disaster housing is important to vulnerable
households so that they will be able to return to a better living condition
before the disaster. However, since permanent housing is completed by
constructing it very quickly, it is important that the life standard of
permanent housing is compatible with the previous experience of the users. In
this sense, post-use assessments of permanent housing, especially produced
after the destructive impact on a disaster, are getting important to subsequent
applications to be more successful. Within this scope, permanent residences in
Subaşı Village, Yalova Province in Turkey have been examined within the context
of post-earthquake transformation applications on 17 August 1999. In the study,
the construction of the houses built in Subaşı Village, the general evaluations
about the design, the criteria of entitlement, the planning process of the
permanent houses, the demographic characteristics of the participants were
assessed.
As a result
of the study, it was seen that the permanent residential areas in Subaşı
village could not integrate with the existing city. With the socialization
processes of households with different characteristics, it was observed that
different qualities of contribution were made to living areas. Neighbourhood
relations and care for open spaces and ownership arrangements affect social
relationships together. Individual solutions to designs and lack of ownership
regulation in common areas also prevent the formation of management units in
permanent residential areas. Thus, an integrated life in the areas of new
housing does not come into being. This has led to the conclusion that in the
process of integration of permanent residential areas with existing urban
areas, social facilities and non-residential uses, business and shopping areas,
schools and green spaces should be constructed within a more comprehensive
framework.