Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCHES IN RELIGIOUS SCIENCES, cilt.23, sa.2, ss.739-762, 2023 (ESCI)
In this study, we will examine the linguistic approaches of a Hanafi jurist who has worked in the field of language. We aim to explore whether jurists who have gained fame through their linguistic works have been able to contribute to the development of language rules and whether they have provided contributions to the field of jurisprudence with these rules. We also seek to address whether individuals working in this field may have shifted language from its pristine state, moving away from its core principles and rules. To answer these questions, we focus on Husameddin es-Signaki, the author of "enNihaye fi serhi'l-Hidaye" and "el-Vafi fi serhi Usuli'l-fikh," commentaries on the book "Usuli'l-fikh," who passed away in 711. Es-Signaki, a renowned Hanafi jurist, excelled in jurisprudence and drew attention with his works in Arabic, including grammar and syntax. Husameddin es-Signaki, prominent for his contributions to simplifying the fields of morphology and syntax, stands out with his commentary "el-Muvassal fi Serhi'l-Mufassal" on Zemahseri's book "el-Mufassal" in the field of syntax, as well as his work "en-Necahu't-Tali Tilve'l-Merah" in the field of morphology. Leveraging his expertise in jurisprudence, he not only interpreted linguistic matters and investigated evidence but also followed the footsteps of his predecessors and illuminated linguistic matters for those who came after him. He emphasized that the concept of "cause" should lead to its own "cause," discussing topics such as the reference of the subject, predicate, and verb, as well as the attribution of objects and circumstantial adjuncts without the presence of prepositions causing attribution or omission, and delving into matters like the cause of a cause or the reason behind the reason. These factors prompted our investigation of this scholar. In our study, we will delve into es-Signaki's brief biography, his summarized views on syntax methods, his book "el-Muvassal fi Serhi'l-Mufassal" in the field of syntax, and "en-Necahu't-tali tilve'l-Merah" in the field of morphology, evaluating his standout views, attitudes, and conclusions. It is correct to say that grammatical science occupies an important position in the field of grammatical regularization and grammatical science. While creating methods of grammar, linguists used Sema, Qiyas, and Ijma, paving the way for the formation of Islamic jurisprudence. Istishab, which is used in the field of fiqh, is also an example of this. This can also be seen in the writings of some scholars who classify Qiya/Ilet Quiyas, Shebeh, Istisan, and Itradu/Talad as Islamic sciences, especially in the fields of recitation, tafsir, hadith, kalam, and fiqh. For example, the issue of the science of qiraat and nahw, which is the basis of the jurisprudential debate on ablution, is understood to have been resolved by the science of language. Language is very important in the transmission of narratives in hadith texts. If it is asked why the fetawiyyah hindiyeh came to see things from a different perspective, even the astrologers needed Arabic to make the Qur'anic expressions comprehensible, and how skillful they were in the field of language to bind the Sunnah, in other words the hadiths, to linguistic rules, the The record shows. Did the jurists and other owners of learning who worked in the field of Arabic follow the methods of the linguists in dealing with the issue of salaf and nahif, or did the reasoning of the jurists come to fruition beyond the boundaries drawn by the linguists? It is also an interesting approach that the linguist Zamakhshari used to express his knowledge of the Hanafi and Shafi'i schools in poetry. It is clear that Sinaqi facilitated the religious language acquisition of the Turks and accelerated their learning of their religion. To see the geographical influence of his upbringing as a jurist, dealing with the basic structure and core vocabulary of the Arabic language as well as the linguistic proofs of Zamakhshari's commentary called "al-Najah" on his book "al-Mufassar," one of the most important Hanafi scholars in his region It is instructive to examine the biography of Husameddin al-Sinaki (d. 714/131), who is accepted.